đ§” The Byzantine Generals' Problem: The 1982 Puzzle That Powers Blockchains Today đïžâïž
You've heard crypto people say this. But do you actually get it?
Let me break down the one idea that makes blockchain possible. đ
1. The Setup
Imagine you're a general. Your army surrounds a fortress.
You need all your generals to agree: Attack at dawn or Retreat.
Sounds easy?
2. Here's the problem:
- You can only send messages through messengers. Some generals are traitors.
- One traitor tells half your army "attack" and half "retreat."
- Messengers get captured. Messages disappear.
- You can't trust anyone.
- How do you all decide on ONE plan when some people are actively trying to deceive you?
This is the Byzantine Generals Problem.
It's from 1982. Math nerds solved it. Then crypto people realized: "Oh crap, this is literally what blockchain needs to do."
3. Why Blockchain Needs This
Here's the core issue:
- Bitcoin has thousands of nodes.
- No central authority.
- They all need to agree on which transactions are real.
But some nodes might be:
- Offline
- Broken
- Actively malicious
- Trying to spend the same coin twice
If the network can't reach agreement despite the bad actors?
Forks. Double-spending. Chaos. The whole thing breaks.
Solving the Byzantine Generals Problem = solving decentralized trust.
4. The Magic Number
Lamport's team figured it out:
- You need MORE than 2/3 of nodes to be honest.
- If 67%+ of your network is good, the good guys can always outvote the bad guys.
- If 33% or more are malicious? They can create conflicting information that honest nodes can't filter.
- This 1/3 threshold is why every blockchain targets ~67% honest stake.
It's not random. It's math.
5. How Bitcoin Solves It
Bitcoin doesn't do voting.
Instead:
- Miners race to solve a puzzle. First one to solve it adds the next block. Everyone follows the longest chain.
- If 51%+ of miners are honest, the longest chain will usually be the honest one. Bad actors can't catch up.
I
- t's "probabilistic" - not instant finality, but after 6 blocks, the odds of a rollback are negligible.
- The key: Proof-of-Work turns the Byzantine problem into an economic game. Attacking costs more than it's worth
6. How Ethereum Solves It
- Ethereum uses voting.
- 32 ETH gets you a validator seat. Validators vote on blocks.
- To finalize a block: need >2/3 of validators to sign off.
- If they do, it's final. Can never revert. Not unless 2/3 of validators conspire.
- Economic incentive: If validators vote wrong, they lose their 32 ETH (slashing).
The key: Make dishonesty so expensive it's irrational.
7. The Three Things That Matter
Every blockchain solving this needs:
1) Safety: All honest nodes agree on the same history. No conflicting truths.
2) Liveness: The chain keeps growing. Doesn't freeze. Blocks keep finalizing.
3) Fault Tolerance: Works even with malicious nodes. Up to 1/3 of them.
Miss one? System breaks.
8. What About Layer 2s?
- Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism, Scroll) do something different.
- They have ONE sequencer. That sequencer decides transaction order.
- One person = not Byzantine fault-tolerant.
- But here's the trick: Ethereum is watching.
- If the sequencer posts a fake state, Ethereum's smart contract rejects it (checks proof). If the sequencer censors, users can force-exit to Ethereum.
L1 is the guardrail.
Eventually, rollups will decentralize sequencers. Then they'll need to solve the Byzantine Generals Problem too.
9. Why This Matters
You've probably heard:
- "Bitcoin solved the Byzantine Generals Problem"
- Now you know what that actually means.
- It means: In a network of strangers where anyone could be lying, you can still reach agreement on truth.
- No trust required. Just math and incentives.
- That's revolutionary.
- Every transaction that finalizes? You're witnessing a solution to a 42-year-old math problem.
That's why blockchain works.
10. The Real Lesson
- The Byzantine Generals don't need to like each other.
- They don't need to trust each other.
- They just need a good protocol.
So does your blockchain.
And now you know why.
668
0
InnehÄllet pÄ den hÀr sidan tillhandahÄlls av tredje part. Om inte annat anges Àr OKX inte författare till den eller de artiklar som citeras och hÀmtar inte nÄgon upphovsrÀtt till materialet. InnehÄllet tillhandahÄlls endast i informationssyfte och representerar inte OKX:s Äsikter. Det Àr inte avsett att vara ett godkÀnnande av nÄgot slag och bör inte betraktas som investeringsrÄdgivning eller en uppmaning att köpa eller sÀlja digitala tillgÄngar. I den mÄn generativ AI anvÀnds för att tillhandahÄlla sammanfattningar eller annan information kan sÄdant AI-genererat innehÄll vara felaktigt eller inkonsekvent. LÀs den lÀnkade artikeln för mer detaljer och information. OKX ansvarar inte för innehÄll som finns pÄ tredje parts webbplatser. Innehav av digitala tillgÄngar, inklusive stabila kryptovalutor och NFT:er, innebÀr en hög grad av risk och kan fluktuera kraftigt. Du bör noga övervÀga om handel med eller innehav av digitala tillgÄngar Àr lÀmpligt för dig mot bakgrund av din ekonomiska situation.

