As I've always told you, projects now place great importance on two criteria: 1-) X quality (number of smart followers) 2-) Wallet quality @brevis_zk Co Founder @no89thkey gave a talk at the panel he attended. I believe the details of this talk actually gave us clues about how we can improve the quality of our wallets. As you know, I do my best to provide smart followers and support. Michael says, "Even if computation complexity increases, verification cost stays low." So, even as the system becomes more complex, the verification process becomes simpler. This logic can also be applied to user behavior. Your on chain history may be complex, but if your behavior is consistent and understandable, verification becomes easy. So, we can summarize what we can do as follows: Demonstrate similar behaviors across different protocols, for example, regular staking every month. Create repetitive but non spammy, sustainable activities instead of random transactions. Leave a consistent history, not a very short term or farm. Appear reliable on chain, not complex. If you swap 0.01 ETH 100 times in the same day, you'll look like a bot. Instead, swap different tokens once or twice a week, for example. For example: ETH to USDC once a week USDC to OP the following week ETH to ARB the following week So, let the Chain see that you're active over time. The same behavior extending over weeks indicates you're a natural user. The fact that Brevis has raised capital from major investors like Binance Labs and Polychain Capital already seems bullish. Furthermore, considering its system's functionality, it can be integrated with many platforms. So, like me, keep researching and explaining.