Orbiter reads like the missing intent layer on top of @noble_xyz : you stop thinking “which bridge, what order, what memo” and just say “USDC on Base → USDN on Hyperliquid,” then the pipe runs itself. That’s how the internet won hide protocols, ship outcomes. ❯ Honest architecture: not “yet another bridge,” pure orchestration. It leans on CCTP / IBC / Hyperlane and coordinates them. The split is clean in your head: Adapter → Executor → Forwarder → Dispatcher. ❯ Real UX gains: Orbiter accepts a JSON payload (e.g., pre_actions for fee splits, forwarding via CCTP) and turns multi-step hops into a one-tap flow. No juggling UIs or approvals. ❯ Scope today vs. next: IBC inbound, CCTP outbound live in v11; Hyperlane inbound/outbound + swaps coming in the major upgrade. Pair that with Noble’s “clean USDC standard + programmable yield” play and the money layer starts feeling portable: fees in USDC, penny-ish internal sends, and IBC moves that don’t slap you with surprise costs (USDC on Noble → FAQ). And for execution headroom, the AppLayer brings an EVM rollup on Celestia aimed at ~100ms blocks so the dollars you route don’t just arrive; they do work. If Orbiter keeps route selection smart, liquidity deep, and error-handling boring, it fades into the background the best compliment for infra. I’ll be stress-testing payload builders next; ship your demo and I’ll try to break it.