“it also shields projects like MOG from cascading liquidations and deeper market damage” “The hard truth is some markets were overexposed. If we did nothing, lenders could get wrecked” MOG “Shortly after launch, we ran an incentive program about 10% of supply going to Moggers”
USDS Allocations: Update In the past 24hrs IMF has received community feedback in relation to dynamic interest rates. We are actively improving our risk models, working with our risk curator to reduce risk for lenders and for listed projects. Pulling back borrow power here is not punishment, it is protection. Below are responses to the most common questions. Q: Why are interest rates so high? The IMF protocol uses Morpho's Interest Rate Manager contracts, which adjust rates with supply and demand. This is how the system protects itself. Recently we reduced liquidity in MOG to protect lenders because the market was overexposed. The spike in interest rate is a temporary side effect of de-risking. Once conditions stabilize and utilization improves, rates will settle back down. This is a short-term safeguard to keep the vault healthy for the long run and how the Morpho contracts work. IMF does not set the interest rate. The good news: we are already seeing corrections within the past 24 hours due to the allocation change. Reducing liquidity is not just about lenders - it also shields projects like MOG from cascading liquidations and deeper market damage. Protecting the protocol means protecting the communities we loan to. Q: Why not just allocate more liquidity? Adding more liquidity right now would only push the problem down the line and make the next correction worse (while markets in general are trending down). More exposure means higher liquidation risk and a greater chance of bad debt. By reducing allocations, we are mitigating the damage. We know it’s painful - but when conditions are more optimistic again, liquidity can scale back up safely. Q: Why are you hurting holders with any interest rate rise? Holders are our core user base. We’re not here to hurt holders - we have to protect them. The hard truth is some markets were overexposed. If we did nothing, lenders could get wrecked and that risk would bleed straight back into borrowers too. De-risking is not fun in the moment, but it keeps vaults sustainable so everyone can keep using their tokens and IMF over the long term. We manage risk by managing allocations, and the Morpho contracts change interest rates based on utilization. Q: What about rewards? Shortly after launch, we ran an incentive program (about 10% of supply going to Moggers and IMF users). Rewards were used to onboard users and jump start the protocol. Rewards are not a standard issue, nor should there be any expectation on these. These are Rewards - used help the protocol grow and benefit friends of IMF. The focus now is on strengthening models so we can underwrite more risk safely. When conditions improve, allocations and rewards can scale again.
2,532
0
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明,OKX 不是所引用文章的作者,也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考,並不代表 OKX 觀點,不作為任何形式的認可,也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下,此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章,瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險,其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況,仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。